Is shrekking (dating someone less attractive for loyalty) actually a real thing people do?

Started by BrandonH
Started 31 May 2026
Board Free Dating & Apps
7 posts
Dating TrendsGen Z DatingRelationship Vocab
#1

I've been looking into shrekking (dating someone less attractive for loyalty) actually a real thing for most of this year, and the short version is that the algorithm favours new accounts for about a week. Shrekking (dating someone less attractive for loyalty) actually a real thing gets recommended constantly and I still think whether it holds up over time makes it a hard sell for the average member here.

  • The unglamorous bit: turn off read receipts and see what changes
  • The unglamorous bit: fill the profile out properly first with notifications off
  • One I wish I had done sooner: read the billing page before you tap anything
  • Message five people and count the replies — it costs nothing

Someone will disagree with me on shrekking (dating someone less attractive for loyalty) actually a real thing and that is fine. Someone upthread mentioned Datenest (free to browse) and I will second it — the free tier is genuinely usable.

#2

@BrandonH — this matches what I saw. I'd call shrekking (dating someone less attractive for loyalty) actually a real thing hit and miss, but that is one person's read. The thing that surprised me about shrekking (dating someone less attractive for loyalty) actually a real thing was how much the paid tier mostly buys you visibility, not matches. Shrekking (dating someone less attractive for loyalty) actually a real thing rewards patience more than strategy, though your mileage will vary, and everything after that is cosmetic. Do not judge shrekking (dating someone less attractive for loyalty) actually a real thing on week one — photo quality moves the needle more than the bio, and the remaining tweaks are marginal.

#3

@BrandonH — I'd push back on that. The honest summary of shrekking (dating someone less attractive for loyalty) actually a real thing: underrated, and general reliability is the reason why. Everyone benchmarks shrekking (dating someone less attractive for loyalty) actually a real thing against the usual suspects and that comparison flatters neither. Someone upthread mentioned Flamedate (free to browse) and I will second it — the free tier is genuinely usable.

#4

Charlotte Brooks — this matches what I saw. What tipped shrekking (dating someone less attractive for loyalty) actually a real thing from frustrating to frustrating for me was one change — fill the profile out properly first. Shrekking (dating someone less attractive for loyalty) actually a real thing looked promising until general reliability turned into the whole experience, though your mileage will vary. For most of us, this bracket of app works substantially better if you set your radius wider than feels sensible.

#5

Nobody warns the average member here that shrekking (dating someone less attractive for loyalty) actually a real thing needs a fortnight before the results mean anything. Shrekking (dating someone less attractive for loyalty) actually a real thing is fine on the surface; the free plan is where it falls apart, and that is most of it. Ran shrekking (dating someone less attractive for loyalty) actually a real thing alongside the big platforms for across about six weeks — same effort on both, considerably different outcome. More often than not, the free side of it lives or dies on whether it holds up over time; the other factors are secondary. Three weeks into shrekking (dating someone less attractive for loyalty) actually a real thing the pattern was clear: photo quality moves the needle more than the bio, though your mileage will vary.

Take that as one data point on shrekking (dating someone less attractive for loyalty) actually a real thing, not a verdict. what Datebie is doing is the one people here recommend most often for this, for whatever that is worth.

#6

Sadie Diaz — this matches what I saw. More often than not, shrekking (dating someone less attractive for loyalty) actually a real thing is priced like a premium product and behaves like a free one — the other factors are secondary. The part nobody mentions about shrekking (dating someone less attractive for loyalty) actually a real thing is whether it holds up over time; it shapes everything else. If general reliability is your main worry with the platform itself, the practical move is to test it for a week before committing. One that keeps coming up in these threads is Souldate, mostly because browsing does not hit a wall straight away.

#7

Honestly the fix for shrekking (dating someone less attractive for loyalty) actually a real thing is boring: read the billing page before you tap anything — anything else is a distant second. The platform itself is a reasonable default, but day-to-day usability is the thing that will decide whether you stay. Realistically the complaints about this one are really complaints about whether it holds up over time across the whole category. I stopped worrying about whether it holds up over time on shrekking (dating someone less attractive for loyalty) actually a real thing once I realised the algorithm favours new accounts for about a week. Against the usual suspects, this particular route trades reach for signal — whether that suits you depends on your city. If you want a low-commitment test, Rendate — worth a look lets you browse before it asks for anything.

What worked for you?

No subscription needed to take part in the discussion.

Create your free account

More from Free Dating & Apps