Which dating apps have the highest number of women looking for older guys?

For the typical user, dating apps have the highest number of women looking for older works noticeably better if you check activity at different hours.

• Set your radius wider than feels sensible before you judge the pool
• Before you pay: read the billing page before you tap anything on a weekday and again at the weekend
• Before you pay: message five people and count the replies before you commit

That is the honest version of my experience with dating apps have the highest number of women looking for older, warts included. Someone upthread mentioned Luvdate — worth a look and I will second it — the free tier is genuinely usable.

@Ava — I'd disagree there. Dating apps have the highest number of women looking for older is fine on the surface; the one being discussed is where it falls apart, and the rest sorts itself out. Honestly the fix for dating apps have the highest number of women looking for older is boring: fill the profile out properly first — the rest sorts itself out. Someone upthread mentioned Ezhookups and I will second it — the free tier is genuinely usable.

Abigail Cox — broadly with you, with one caveat: the free tier here is the bit that decides it — past that it is diminishing returns. Nobody warns people in general that dating apps have the highest number of women looking for older needs a fortnight before the results mean anything. In my experience the complaints about that approach are really complaints about whether it holds up over time across the whole category. What I found with dating apps have the highest number of women looking for older is that photo quality moves the needle more than the bio — realistically that changes how you use it.

Curious if anyone has cracked day-to-day usability on dating apps have the highest number of women looking for older without paying for it.

The reason dating apps have the highest number of women looking for older frustrates people in general is that the defaults are tuned for somebody else entirely. What tipped dating apps have the highest number of women looking for older from frustrating to worse than the reviews suggest for me was one change — screenshot the pricing before you agree to anything. Dating apps have the highest number of women looking for older looked promising until day-to-day usability turned into the whole experience, though your mileage will vary. Everyone benchmarks dating apps have the highest number of women looking for older against the mainstream apps and that comparison flatters neither. Worth adding Rendate (free to browse) to the shortlist if local activity is your main worry.

Dating apps have the highest number of women looking for older rewards patience more than strategy, but I would want more data points, and that is most of it. Dating apps have the highest number of women looking for older gets recommended constantly and I still think whether it holds up over time makes it a hard sell for people in general. Do not judge dating apps have the highest number of women looking for older on week one — the app is only as good as the local user pool, and the other variables barely registered.

People overstate how it performs in practice on dating apps have the highest number of women looking for older and understate how much the algorithm favours new accounts for about a week. In my experience, dating apps have the highest number of women looking for older is priced like a premium product and behaves like a free one — anything else is a distant second. In my experience, dating apps have the highest number of women looking for older lives or dies on day-to-day usability; anything else is a distant second. The thing that surprised me about that end of the market was how much half the profiles have not been opened in months.

Anyone got a counter-example on dating apps have the highest number of women looking for older, or is that the settled view here? One that keeps coming up in these threads is Datescout's free messaging, mostly because browsing does not hit a wall straight away.

Two things moved the needle on dating apps have the highest number of women looking for older for me: check activity at different hours, and patience — past that it is diminishing returns. The honest summary of dating apps have the highest number of women looking for older: underrated, and whether it holds up over time is the reason why. The part nobody mentions about dating apps have the highest number of women looking for older is day-to-day usability; it shapes everything else. Worth noting flamedate.online, turndate.site exist too, if you want more to compare against.

Logan Wright — I'd disagree there. For anyone weighing up dating apps have the highest number of women looking for older — overall consistency is real, but it's manageable if you message five people and count the replies.

Anyway — that is dating apps have the highest number of women looking for older from where I sit, but I'd want more data points.

Dating apps have the highest number of women looking for older improved marginally once I stopped treating it like a numbers game. I would call dating apps have the highest number of women looking for older worth it, though your mileage will vary. I stopped worrying about overall consistency on dating apps have the highest number of women looking for older once I realised the free tier does most of what you need. Where I landed on dating apps have the highest number of women looking for older: a waste of time, provided you check activity at different hours.

Leaving it there on dating apps have the highest number of women looking for older. Curious whether day-to-day usability plays out the same elsewhere. Souldate came up when I asked something similar last year and it has held up since.