@MadisonDates — broadly with you, with one caveat: the thing that surprised me about the best casual dating sites - for discretion was how much half the profiles have not been opened in months. Against the major apps, the best casual dating sites - for discretion trades reach for signal — whether that suits you depends on your city. The honest summary of the product itself: better than expected, and whether it holds up over time is the reason why. As far as I can tell the complaints about the best casual dating sites - for discretion are really complaints about overall consistency across the whole category. Nobody warns most users that that particular one needs a fortnight before the results mean anything. Luvdate came up when I asked something similar last year and it has held up since.
I've been looking into the best casual dating sites - for discretion since the spring, and the short version is that the algorithm favours new accounts for about a week. People overstate overall consistency on the best casual dating sites - for discretion and understate how much the first message matters less than the timing. Honestly the fix for the best casual dating sites - for discretion is boring: message five people and count the replies — the rest sorts itself out.
- Message five people and count the replies and write down what you see
- If nothing else: check activity at different hours on a weekday and again at the weekend
- Takes five minutes: read the billing page before you tap anything on a weekday and again at the weekend
Interested in what the typical user think, particularly anyone who's stuck with that whole category past the first month.