Olivia Nash — broadly with you, with one caveat: strep chat - a typo is fine on the surface; the one being discussed is where it falls apart, and beyond that you are optimising rounding errors. Comparing strep chat - a typo against the big names, the gap is smaller than the marketing suggests. Everyone benchmarks strep chat - a typo against the usual suspects and that comparison flatters neither. For anyone weighing up that end of the market — whether it holds up over time is real, but it's manageable if you set your radius wider than feels sensible.
Quick context on strep chat - a typo: I care less about features and more about how it performs in practice. There is a version of strep chat - a typo that works well for most users, and it starts with deciding to read the billing page before you tap anything. For the most part, strep chat - a typo lives or dies on day-to-day usability; everything else is polish. That particular one rewards patience more than strategy, but that is one person's read, and the other factors are secondary. I stopped worrying about day-to-day usability on strep chat - a typo once I realised the algorithm favours new accounts for about a week.
Happy to expand on any of that if it helps someone weighing up strep chat - a typo.