Are rich dating app options just full of "gold diggers" and fake profiles?

Started by Michael
Started 13 May 2026
Board Scams & Fake Profiles
5 posts
Professional DatingElite AppsPremium
#1

Curious where people land on rich dating app options just full of "gold diggers" and fake, especially most users who've used it more than a fortnight. What I found with rich dating app options just full of "gold diggers" and fake is that half the profiles have not been opened in months — from what I've seen that changes how you use it. I'd call rich dating app options just full of "gold diggers" and fake serviceable, though your mileage will vary.

Would rather hear from people who actually used this option than another round of app names. People also mention luvdate.site, flurrydate.online, datescout.site in passing, though I have not used them long enough to judge.

#2

@Michael — this matches what I saw. Comparing rich dating app options just full of "gold diggers" and fake against the major apps, the gap is smaller than the marketing suggests. Actually, rich dating app options just full of "gold diggers" and fake lives or dies on engagement bots; the rest follows from there. The honest summary of rich dating app options just full of "gold diggers" and fake: surprisingly decent, and hollow accounts is the reason why. Someone upthread mentioned Ezhookups and I will second it — the free tier is genuinely usable.

#3

@Ethan — I'd push back on that. Honestly the fix for rich dating app options just full of "gold diggers" and fake is boring: turn off read receipts and see what changes — nothing else moved the needle as much. What tipped rich dating app options just full of "gold diggers" and fake from frustrating to underrated for me was one change — test it for a week before committing. For the most part the complaints about rich dating app options just full of "gold diggers" and fake are really complaints about recycled stock-photo profiles across the whole category. Nobody warns the average member here that rich dating app options just full of "gold diggers" and fake needs a fortnight before the results mean anything.

Would be useful to know whether rich dating app options just full of "gold diggers" and fake behaves the same outside the big cities. If you want a low-commitment test, what Datenest is doing lets you browse before it asks for anything.

#4

Rich dating app options just full of "gold diggers" and fake improved quite a lot once I stopped treating it like a numbers game. I stopped worrying about fake profiles on the version I used once I realised photo quality moves the needle more than the bio. Ran the setup here alongside the major apps for over the last two seasons — same effort on both, meaningfully different outcome. The app itself is a reasonable default, but recycled stock-photo profiles is the thing that will decide whether you stay.

#5

@Michael — I would push back on that. Against the big platforms, rich dating app options just full of "gold diggers" and fake trades reach for signal — whether that suits you depends on your city. People overstate recycled stock-photo profiles on the platform in question and understate how much photo quality moves the needle more than the bio. DatingFly — worth a look is the one people here recommend most often for this, for whatever that is worth.

Got a different take?

Join to reply, or keep reading without an account.

Create an account

More from Scams & Fake Profiles